|Author(s)||Benjamin Waysome1, Gail Tomblin Murphy2, Adrian MacKenzie3, Rowena Palmer 4, Joan Guy-Walker 5, Annette Elliott Rose6, Ivy Bourgeault7, Ronald Labonte8|
|Affiliation(s)||1Strategic Human Resource Management, Jamaica Ministry of Health, Kingston, Jamaica, 2WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning and Research, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada, 3WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning and Research, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada, 4Strategic Human Resources Planning, Jamaica Ministry of Health, Kingston, Jamaica, 5Human Resource Management and Development, Jamaica Ministry of Health, Kingston, Jamaica, 6WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre on Health Workforce Planning and Research, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada, 7School of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada, 8Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada|
|Country - ies of focus||Global, Jamaica|
|Relevant to the conference tracks||Advocacy and Communication|
|Summary||Although migration of human resources for health (HRH) is common, the consequences of it for ‘source’ countries are poorly understood, as are the range of strategies implemented to manage these consequences. A study of ‘source’ country perspectives on HRH migration, funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, was conducted in India, Jamaica, the Philippines and South Africa to address this gap. This paper reports the findings from Jamaica, where HRH migration is common, and the causes of it are numerous, long-standing, and systemic. Several strategies have been implemented to address the consequences of HRH emigration from Jamaica, however their impacts have not been studied.|
|Background||The migration of highly skilled health professionals from developing to developed nations has increased dramatically in the last ten years in response to a range of social, economic and political factors. The consequences of this shift in human resources for health (HRH) can be of critical importance to the overall sustainability of health systems in many of these ‘source’ countries, and have become much more salient in the ongoing debate about the reliance of some high-income countries on health workers who migrate from low- and middle-income countries. Few studies have examined these trends and their consequences from a comparative approach; those that have typically focus on ‘macro-‘level health indicators which do not allow for a broader investigation of the range of impacts HRH migration may have on patients, providers and health systems. Further, existing evidence is almost exclusively limited to physicians and nurses without considering the roles of other highly skilled health professionals who are also critical to the sustainability of developing health systems. Research to date has also given less attention to the range of responses that various policy decision-makers can and have undertaken to stem the tide of emigrating workers, and on their respective impacts.|
|Objectives||To help to address the above gaps in evidence, a study was undertaken to examine the causes, consequences and responses to HRH migration from four ‘source’ countries – India, Jamaica, the Philippines, and South Africa. Although designed, initiated and overseen by a team of Canadian researchers, the study was largely driven by partners ‘on the ground’ in each of the four participating countries.The research questions the study sought to answer include:
(1) What is the present picture of /recent historic trends in the migration of highly skilled health personnel from Jamaica, the Philippines, India, and South Africa? (a) Who is migrating, how, and why? (b) What are the levels and impacts of return migration? (2) What, according to various stakeholders ‘on the ground’ in these source countries, are the most critical consequences of the migration of highly skilled health workers? (3) What is the range of policy responses that have been considered, proposed and implemented to address the critical causes and consequences of health worker migration from these countries, and what have been some of the outcomes of these responses?In addition to physicians and nurses, each participating country selected two additional categories of HRH to be the focus of their investigations. The purpose of this presentation is to share the study’s findings from Jamaica, where the additional professions selected were midwives and dental auxiliaries
|Methodology||The study built on a long-standing successful HRH research partnership between Dalhousie University and the Jamaica Ministry of Health. There were three data collection activities used to address the research questions: a scoping review, key informant interviews, and a survey of Jamaica’s dental auxiliaries, midwives, nurses and physicians. The scoping review identified and synthesized the published peer-reviewed and grey literature on Jamaica as it pertained to the research questions. The initial draft of the scoping review was completed by Canadian members of the research team, reviewed by Jamaican stakeholders for completeness and accuracy, and then updated to address identified gaps. Twenty seven key informants, representing Jamaica’s Ministry of Health, regional health authorities (RHAs), professional colleges and associations, private and public hospitals, universities, the Pan American Health Organization, and the Statistical Institute of Jamaica, were interviewed by the Jamaican study coordinator. The interviews were transcribed, validated by the interviewees, and then subjected to thematic analysis with NVivo 10. The survey of health care professionals was administered using both web and paper based versions. Respondents could choose their desired format. Survey data were subjected to descriptive and regression analysis using SAS 9.2.Preliminary findings from the scoping review and qualitative and quantitative analyses were presented at a deliberative forum at the University of the West Indies (UWI) campus outside Kingston, Jamaica. Participants represented Jamaica’s Ministry of Health, Ministry of Labour and Social Security, Ministry of National Security, and Ministry of Foreign Affairs, each of the four targeted health professions, the RHAs, UWI, private hospitals, Passport and Immigration Services, the Statistical Institute of Jamaica and the Planning Institute of Jamaica. Participants validated the study findings and deliberated several potential strategies to mitigate the negative impacts of migration on Jamaica’s health care system. These findings were subsequently shared with representatives of the other participating countries at an international forum to identify common challenges and potential solutions.|
|Results||Data on HRH migration are not systematically captured in Jamaica. Migration rates for physicians are estimated at between 31% and 58%, and 66% for nurses. Over one third of respondents from each profession reported that it was very likely they would emigrate within the next five years.Asked why they would emigrate, the top three working conditions-related reasons were income, infrastructure at work, and lack of opportunity for advancement. The top three living conditions-related reasons for migrating were cost of living, public infrastructure, and the quality of consumer goods. Interviewees frequently cited an outdated cadre system as being a barrier to employing necessary personnel, and to advancement for those who are employed. Twenty two percent of respondents reported experiencing some unemployment in the past five years. Fifteen percent of respondents described their current economic situation as “Good” or better and 23% described it as “Poor”. Regression analyses indicated that, after controlling for respondents’ age, gender, profession, years in practice, source of funding for training, and main sector of work (public vs. private), only age was a significant predictor of respondents’ intention to migrate. Older respondents were less likely to report an intention to migrate.Respondents reported being much more likely to receive or make inquiries about working abroad through colleagues in other countries than through recruitment agencies. One third of respondents reported having applied to write the licensing exam for their profession in another country.
Eleven percent of respondents reported having worked in their profession in another country, mostly other Caribbean countries, and returning. Most of these respondents reported being unsure whether their returns were permanent.
Interviewees reported that HRH who migrate tend to be more experienced, which reduces the leadership and mentoring skills available to those who remain. Respondents described international HRH migration as having a more negative impact than rural to urban or public to private sector migration. Eighty percent of respondents said they would send money home to Jamaica if they did migrate. Remittances from all Jamaicans living abroad are estimated at $2B USD or 1/7th of Jamaica’s GDP.
Jamaica has implemented a number of domestic and international strategies to mitigate the negative impacts of HRH migration. However, the impacts of these programs are unknown.
|Conclusion||Although its current health information systems preclude a precise quantification of the extent of HRH migration, it is clear that migration is very common among Jamaica’s health care personnel. It is also clear from published literature as well as the study participants that the causes of migration in Jamaica are numerous, long-standing, and systemic. Unfortunately, deeper understanding of the causes and consequences of migration, as well as the various strategies implemented to mitigate those consequences, is hindered by a variety of factors. These include weak health information systems (HIS) and infrequent policy evaluation. Recent efforts by Jamaica’s Ministry of Health, in collaboration with other partners, to strengthen its HIS, update its HRH cadre, and increase its capacity for HRH research and policy evaluation may help to address these issues.The study was limited by a low response rate to the survey of health personnel. There were 361 respondents to the survey. Although accurate data on the number of licensed health personnel currently in Jamaica are not available, the estimated size of the potential respondent pool across the four targeted professions is just under 6,000. This makes for a response rate of less than 10%. That said, the findings of the study were validated by a range of Jamaican stakeholders as being consistent with their experience. Further, it was noted by participants at the international forum that many of the findings from Jamaica were consistent with those from the other participating ‘source’ countries. This indicates that its results have national and global validity, strengthening the case for their incorporation into Jamaica’s HRH policy.|